| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kgarrett12486
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 11922
Location: Busch III
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:31 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Special Teamer wrote: | | Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play. |
The ball hit Givens in the hands and went through. It was a catchable ball. The play should have been completed by Givens...
_________________
Rammy on the sig...
RIP "El Fenomeno" - Oscar Taveras |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 3248
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Sam played a really good game, I'm very happy. Only play I want back is the Jax dump off when he had Lancealot.
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D9-EM
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 719
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Thanks for the insight jrry32. I was pretty ticked at Bradford watching this live so its definitely appreciated. Hopefully you can keep this sort of thing coming whenever you notice it.
Special Teamer, I noticed the UCF logo on your sig. My wife is dragging down to Florida next year so she can go to school there. Looks like you won't be the only Rams/UCF fan in Orlando anymore. 
_________________
Go Rams! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 63516
Location: Jared Goffs Bed
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I saw the vid of this.. Gibson was open to the left and Jackson had about 10 yards of space.. 
Sam should pump more.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 68966
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Special Teamer wrote: | | Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play. |
Stafford threw the same ball which CJ caught for a 51 yard gain.
Bradford threw the ball around 57 to 58 yards without stepping into it. Had he stepped into it and hit Givens in stride, it would have likely been a 65 to 70 yard throw. Tough throw to make. He did under throw it but we really need a WR who can make a play on the ball in the air...that was why I wanted Alshon.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 63516
Location: Jared Goffs Bed
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | Special Teamer wrote: | | Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play. |
Stafford threw the same ball which CJ caught for a 51 yard gain.
Bradford threw the ball around 57 to 58 yards without stepping into it. Had he stepped into it and hit Givens in stride, it would have likely been a 65 to 70 yard throw. Tough throw to make. He did under throw it but we really need a WR who can make a play on the ball in the air...that was why I wanted Alshon. |
Quick would have caught that. He attacks the ball with force..
Givens tried to body catch it. Reminds me of some Avery..
Man how I miss lil Donny 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iRaMs
Joined: 05 May 2010
Posts: 5426
Location: Teletran 1
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | Special Teamer wrote: | | Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play. |
Stafford threw the same ball which CJ caught for a 51 yard gain.
Bradford threw the ball around 57 to 58 yards without stepping into it. Had he stepped into it and hit Givens in stride, it would have likely been a 65 to 70 yard throw. Tough throw to make. He did under throw it but we really need a WR who can make a play on the ball in the air...that was why I wanted Alshon. |
_________________
Jared Cook: MIA
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
S-jax39
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 7571
Location: [D]MV
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We couldve gotten alshon instead of pead. Nope.
_________________
Welp |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 63516
Location: Jared Goffs Bed
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| S-jax39 wrote: | | We couldve gotten alshon instead of pead. Nope. |
You guys are insane.. Way too early.. Way way too early.
Pead looks shady mccoy shifty.. You gotta let the kid develop
same with Quick..
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The J.R.S.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 4389
Location: Next to Waldo
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| El ramster wrote: | | S-jax39 wrote: | | We couldve gotten alshon instead of pead. Nope. |
You guys are insane.. Way too early.. Way way too early.
Pead looks shady mccoy shifty.. You gotta let the kid develop
same with Quick.. |
Are we also going to pretend that Jeffery stood out in the Bears/Indy game? Because that's a joke, he barely showed up besides the one big play. That was busted coverage, Gibson would have made that same play.
Anyone ever notice that our opponents rarely blow coverage against our WRs? Do you think that is coincidence or can we finally admit that our pass catchers are pathetic?
Edit: Danny Amendola would be a reserve player on at least half the rosters in the NFL. We think he is a star because he is the only player on our team that has displayed the ability to make tough catches. He will never be the difference maker in a game, only a complimentary piece.
_________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
S-jax39
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 7571
Location: [D]MV
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
No No, Amendola is a good player Imo. He'd start in the slot for alot of teams. He gets seperation and finds holes in zones and has reliable hands. The rest of our WRs? Nothing special. Been preaching this since we drafted Sam.
Also, im just not a huge fan of pead. I wouldve rather had another WR or a linemen there. I just dont think hes going to be anything special, and he cant even capture the back up role. Obviously I hope im wrong but its just an opinion.
_________________
Welp
Last edited by S-jax39 on Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 63516
Location: Jared Goffs Bed
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Saffold practice today. Not heavily but still promising.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ray
Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 579
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Quick might have caught that pass, but I don't think
He would have had the same separation |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D9-EM
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 719
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Ray wrote: | Quick might have caught that pass, but I don't think
He would have had the same separation |
Yea that's easy to say but it think Fisher has a plan for him. Its exciting to see Fisher actually developing these early round guys instead of burning them up right off the bat.
_________________
Go Rams! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 68966
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The J.R.S. wrote: |
Are we also going to pretend that Jeffery stood out in the Bears/Indy game? Because that's a joke, he barely showed up besides the one big play. That was busted coverage, Gibson would have made that same play. |
First of all, Jeffery had 3 catches for 80 yards and a TD in his debut, I'd say that's standing out. Second of all, there was no busted coverage. Jeffery was matched up 1 on 1 with Vontae Davis and ran right by him.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
