| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
3rivers
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 1891
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:48 pm Post subject: The Official OL thread Preseason game 3 vs Bills by 3rivers |
 |
|
|
DD injury is not nice but other than that what did you think of the OL mostly the first team plus Adams.
Adams played well, nice block on the TD.
On the 99yrd driver, there was good work up front. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GreasyApples
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 614
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Enough is enough.
_________________
Props to mike23md! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SMashMouthMike
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 4141
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Thread title is longer than your analysis, bro! 
_________________
Thanks Lyasr 529 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MightyJoeYoung
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 2738
Location: Wakefield, England
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Feck off please
_________________
Thanks to Joe_is_the_best for the sig
"The King Stay the King" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
turtle28
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 57313
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
We've talked at length about this. No need for a new thread bro
_________________
 mike23md | Marcus21 wrote: | | The secondary...OMG what a bag of turds! |
Brian Orakpo:43 tkls, 8.5 sacks, 4 PDs, Int for TDRIP SSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FourThreeMafia
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 44169
Location: East of Sixburgh
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
As ridiculous as your OLine obsession is, it would be more acceptable if you started this thread with an actual thorough breakdown of each OLineman or even the OLine as a unit, as opposed to three short basic snippets my football-retarded mother could make.
Seriously.... don't go away mad. Just go away.
Good lord.
_________________
| NextBigThing wrote: | | if i were the pats, i would take [Luck] only after brady and rodgers. i prefer luck to manning, brees, and many others |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dook
Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 2029
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
So those who don't want to talk about Steelers football instead try to insult the guy who starts a topic they don't want to talk about?
If you don't want to talk football then why are you here? Oh right, because this is the free insult place, not the Steelers football place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dook
Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 2029
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll chat with you 3rivers about Steelers football.
I think an OL of Starks, Colon, Pouncey, Foster, Gilbert can do well. We can get to the super bowl with these guys because we've done it in the past with an OL that was probably worse than them.
But if we lose Starks, oh man, Ben's in trouble. If we lose Gilbert I think they'll move Foster over to RT and play Leg or maybe Lee at RG.
I don't think Beachum should make the roster but they may have to keep him considering the injury to DeCastro. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3rivers
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 1891
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dook wrote: | So those who don't want to talk about Steelers football instead try to insult the guy who starts a topic they don't want to talk about?
If you don't want to talk football then why are you here? Oh right, because this is the free insult place, not the Steelers football place. |
+1
amen
All I did was post a topic and left it open for discussion. The OL looked good in the long drive, the reason that drive happened. They have been criticized for how long, but played well on that drive against a good front. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3rivers
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 1891
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dook wrote: | I'll chat with you 3rivers about Steelers football.
I think an OL of Starks, Colon, Pouncey, Foster, Gilbert can do well. We can get to the super bowl with these guys because we've done it in the past with an OL that was probably worse than them.
But if we lose Starks, oh man, Ben's in trouble. If we lose Gilbert I think they'll move Foster over to RT and play Leg or maybe Lee at RG.
I don't think Beachum should make the roster but they may have to keep him considering the injury to DeCastro. |
Adams played well but it was vs 2nd stringers. Still , once Adams is healthy he will get better all the time. When we had DD the OL was 7 deep, now we just have 1 good backup with Adams. Beechum should be cut asap, but is he another one of these players the coaches like that we don't. It sucks that they can't get players to replace essux. Beechum better not make the team, I mean what if more injuries happen and beechum and essux are out there? I always thought Foster was a good player and he made a nice play with the Red TD. This OL has potential but now no depth at OG  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JDLefebvre
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23479
Location: Midway PA /Clovis NM
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 3rivers wrote: | | All I did was post a topic and left it open for discussion. |
You know the real reason people give you a hard time about your constant obsession with the O-Line.
_________________
Stay low boys.... keep those feet moving!
Sig by Joe_is_the_best
KCCO!!!
oderint dum metuant |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dook
Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 2029
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Adams is just not ready. He definately should get better with time but I wouldn't put him at LT yet just because it's going to be too tough on Ben. Next year I would try Adams at LT again and see how he does.
I haven't seen enough of OG Lee but at this point I would take him over what I have seen of Beechum.
As for Essex, I just don't see why the team is showing so much loyalty to him. I think we can get the same performance from a guy like Lee and Essex veteran minimum salary is higher than a rookie so cutting him will help out our cap situation.
I liked Foster more than most, not saying he's dominant or a great down field blocker or anything like that, just that he's good enough to hold is own. I'm confidant with him at OG but not so sure of him at OT, if that's where they play him, until I see more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GreasyApples
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 614
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dook wrote: | So those who don't want to talk about Steelers football instead try to insult the guy who starts a topic they don't want to talk about?
|
It's more so the fact that he's starting unnecessary threads when this could've been talked about in the gameday thread, other DD thread, etc. It's gotten excessive. And quite frankly should be considered spam.
| Quote: | | All I did was post a topic and left it open for discussion |
C'mon, man. Let's not play that card. You know that that's not what it is.
_________________
Props to mike23md! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3rivers
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 1891
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GreasyApples wrote: | | Dook wrote: | So those who don't want to talk about Steelers football instead try to insult the guy who starts a topic they don't want to talk about?
|
It's more so the fact that he's starting unnecessary threads when this could've been talked about in the gameday thread, other DD thread, etc. It's gotten excessive. And quite frankly should be considered spam.
| Quote: | | All I did was post a topic and left it open for discussion |
C'mon, man. Let's not play that card. You know that that's not what it is. |
So, with the hopeful improvements , can't there be a thread for the OL?
THis has been an area of concern, for everyone not just me. Sounds like this will just be a part of the gameday thread, why have any seperate threads, just name all threads Steelers thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GreasyApples
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 614
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 3rivers wrote: | | GreasyApples wrote: | | Dook wrote: | So those who don't want to talk about Steelers football instead try to insult the guy who starts a topic they don't want to talk about?
|
It's more so the fact that he's starting unnecessary threads when this could've been talked about in the gameday thread, other DD thread, etc. It's gotten excessive. And quite frankly should be considered spam.
| Quote: | | All I did was post a topic and left it open for discussion |
C'mon, man. Let's not play that card. You know that that's not what it is. |
So, with the hopeful improvements , can't there be a thread for the OL?
THis has been an area of concern, for everyone not just me. Sounds like this will just be a part of the gameday thread, why have any seperate threads, just name all threads Steelers thread. |
Well, the fact that you explicitly refer to game 3 of the preseason in the title tells me that you should've included this in the gameday thread anyways.
And dude....no one's forbidding you to start a thread about the OLine here. It's just that you could've bumped one of your many "official" OLine threads instead of just being redundant and spamming this forum with more like topics. It's not hard to understand.
But hey...Ramon being in the lineup only brings us back to where we were last year on the OLine. We can only hope Ben can extend this recent trend of getting the ball out faster into the regular season.
_________________
Props to mike23md! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
