Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

If Claiborne and Richardson are gone...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Tampa Bay Buccaneers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BucsFanTillDead


Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Posts: 505
Location: Tampa
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we took Kalil our lien would be set for 5+ years. I mean the line is really good now, but it would be the best in the NFL with Kalil IMO. Thats something we have never had or probably are even used to seeing. With a quality back in rounds 2-3 we would be able to pound the ball, and protect Free to do as he pleases on defenses.
_________________

You might know me as Gdubbz on other Bucs fan community's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Seminolebuc


Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Posts: 960
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucsEST96 wrote:
Seminolebuc wrote:
bucsEST96 wrote:
Its funny everyone on the Kuechly bandwagon now. I bring him up a month ago-"oh he's ruud2.0", "can't cover". "can't blitz" now that the scholar Claiborne won't be there you've ppl opened your eyes

I still think he is Ruud 2.0 and i dont want the bucs to pick him. I watched the guy play for the last few years and hes very underwhelming. That BC system always funnels tackles right into that MLB and all he has to do is just square up well or just jump on the pile.


Just stop talking please, you just showed your cards because I know for a fact you've never seen him play or his film. Dude is all over the damn field and you talking bout he got guys funneled to him lmaooooo

False, I watch a ton of Boston College games due to them being in the ACC and i watch most of the teams in the ACC play their games. I've also been watching Montel Harris since his high school days so i've made even more of a point to watch the BC games since he started going there.

That 3-4 they run at BC has always lead to extremely high takcle stats by one of the LBs in the corp. Before Kuechly it was Herzlich.

Just please quit talking, you showed your character within the first few words. lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Rolling Eyes
_________________


Props to Eggy
Adopt-a-Buc
Josh Freeman


Last edited by Seminolebuc on Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sandman2300


Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 69
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seminolebuc wrote:
bucsEST96 wrote:
Seminolebuc wrote:
bucsEST96 wrote:
Its funny everyone on the Kuechly bandwagon now. I bring him up a month ago-"oh he's ruud2.0", "can't cover". "can't blitz" now that the scholar Claiborne won't be there you've ppl opened your eyes

I still think he is Ruud 2.0 and i dont want the bucs to pick him. I watched the guy play for the last few years and hes very underwhelming. That BC system always funnels tackles right into that MLB and all he has to do is just square up well or just jump on the pile.


Just stop talking please, you just showed your cards because I know for a fact you've never seen him play or his film. Dude is all over the damn field and you talking bout he got guys funneled to him lmaooooo

False, I watch a ton of Boston College games due to them being in the ACC and i watch most of the teams in the ACC play their games. I've also been watching Montell Harris since his high school days so i've made even more of a point to watch the BC games since he started going there.

That 3-4 they run at BC has always lead to extremely high takcle stats by one of the LBs in the corp. Before Kuechly it was Herzlich.

Just please quit talking, you showed your character within the first few words. lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Rolling Eyes


I'm going to agree with seminolebuc on this for the most part- although i think from a physical standpoint he's more athletic than Ruud- he's certainly not in the willis/beason mold either. A very instinctual player but If I'm picking a player with the 5th overall pick- I want to get a very good player with ELITE athletic ability that I can't get at pick 25 lets say. That's the difference between the 5th pick and the 20th pick- both players are probably very good at their position- but one of them is very good while also being an elite athlete- I don't see it from Luke
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
96BucsBallin


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucstopshere


Moderator
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 13578
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James


I like that ALOT
_________________

#TradeUpForTeddy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
BBando


Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 7291
Location: Tampa Bay
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James
LaMichael is going to get ripped a new one in the NFL. I just don't like him.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5nick5


Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 1222
Location: Florida
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BBando wrote:
96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James
LaMichael is going to get ripped a new one in the NFL. I just don't like him.


I know, I'm fed up with people still thinking that he's a good fit here, or anywhere in the NFL. He doesn't have the durability.
_________________


Thanks to BGG on the sig.

Adopt-a-Buc - Johnthan Banks 40 Tackles 2INT 5PD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
96BucsBallin


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

5nick5 wrote:
BBando wrote:
96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James
LaMichael is going to get ripped a new one in the NFL. I just don't like him.


I know, I'm fed up with people still thinking that he's a good fit here, or anywhere in the NFL. He doesn't have the durability.


LaMichael James - 5'9 195
Danny Woodhead - 5'8 195
Barry Sanders - 5'8 200
Darren Sproles - 5'6 190
Jacquizz Rodgers - 5'6 196
Here is Rodgers running over Mason Fostrer for his first NFL TD.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Xoy2ZDIZO0

So plenty of smaller RB that excel in the NFL in multi RB backfields. So size isn't an issue with Blount here.

What else am I missing? His freak arm injury that only happened because his College coach played starters deep into the 4th quarter because he liked to run the score up for a better chance at the BCS title? Are there any other major injuries?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Buccaneer4life


Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 3509
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James


Would love that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Caaddy24


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 5348
Location: Houston
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

5nick5 wrote:
BBando wrote:
96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James
LaMichael is going to get ripped a new one in the NFL. I just don't like him.


I know, I'm fed up with people still thinking that he's a good fit here, or anywhere in the NFL. He doesn't have the durability.


I bet he would be more durable than trent richardson. Think about the different running styles. Richardson is gonna be pounding it all day, that takes a tole on the body. James is small and elusive thus won't take those big hits[/i]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sandman2300


Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 69
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Caaddy24 wrote:
5nick5 wrote:
BBando wrote:
96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James
LaMichael is going to get ripped a new one in the NFL. I just don't like him.


I know, I'm fed up with people still thinking that he's a good fit here, or anywhere in the NFL. He doesn't have the durability.


I bet he would be more durable than trent richardson. Think about the different running styles. Richardson is gonna be pounding it all day, that takes a tole on the body. James is small and elusive thus won't take those big hits[/i]


there's no point in trying to reason with them.

You don't draft James to be an every down back in the nfl because that's not what he is. If you want a true scat back to throw in there and wreak hell on defenses than he's exactly what you're looking for. He's a a durable guy with good hands and electric speed. He's a nice complement for Blount if he's there in the third but I have a feeling he's gone before the halfway point in round 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YoungBucs15


Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 3708
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James


I would be fine with James but I think someone like Polk would fit better with what we need and should be available at that pick.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
96BucsBallin


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

YoungBucs15 wrote:
96BucsBallin wrote:
Trade #5 to Buffalo for #10 and #71.

#10 Mark Barron
#36 Lavonte David
#68 Trumaine Johnson
#71 LaMichael James


I would be fine with James but I think someone like Polk would fit better with what we need and should be available at that pick.


Yeah it all comes down to that, personal preference, and I know Dom has said in the past that he likes big, bruising RB's so I doubt we get a scat back. And like Sandman said, he may be gone at that point so guys like Polk and Pead, both balanced rb's, could be available while Cyrus Gray and Ronnie Hillman are potential scat backs available.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tdfast


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 11195
Location: Edmonton
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the Buffalo trade down but you can't thumb your nose at an elite LT. If Kalil is there I doubt we trade down. Penn is 29 and his contract has paid all the guaranteed money. And there's no reason he can't play RT. It's not ideal but it's better than Trueblood and at #5 you have to take the best player. Kalil is the best player.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mfw096


Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 2851
Location: UNLV
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BucsFanTillDead wrote:
If we took Kalil our lien would be set for 5+ years. I mean the line is really good now, but it would be the best in the NFL with Kalil IMO. Thats something we have never had or probably are even used to seeing. With a quality back in rounds 2-3 we would be able to pound the ball, and protect Free to do as he pleases on defenses.


Dude, that sig is sick! I want one lol
_________________
Adopt a Buc:
Darrelle Revis - 50 TCKL 2 FF 2 INT 1 SCK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Tampa Bay Buccaneers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group