| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PackerfromFL
Joined: 10 Nov 2011 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:21 pm Post subject: Packers should sign Tenard Jackson |
|
|
|
He got cut from the Bucs. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009 Posts: 6403 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He is also terrible. Why sign a S who can't tackle and can't cover? Combine him with Peprah to form the wosrt S duo ever? _________________
| ChaRisMa wrote: | | I thought I was the only one adding three inches. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PackerfromFL
Joined: 10 Nov 2011 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well its depth. And also I'm sure Jackson/Peprah would be a better duo than say, you and I. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skibrett15 
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1042 Location: nibelheim
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Pretty sure it's Tanard.
1) not a high character guy.
2) can't beat out sabby piscitelli? Not good enough for the NFL. Pretty sure that's in the NFL bylaws. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ugLymayNe 
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 10748 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He was very good for one year but he sucked when he came back from his suspension. As said before, not a high character guy. That wouldnt matter to me if he could play but.........lacks in that department too. _________________ @PJHotel_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vang_evo9
Joined: 13 Aug 2011 Posts: 706 Location: Fresno, CA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| No they shouldn't. He's like an unhealthy Peprah minus the character. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mattwaukee
Joined: 22 Jan 2009 Posts: 3273
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
errrrrrrr ... This makes me nervous _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TedThompson 
Joined: 01 Aug 2011 Posts: 802
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The guy is awful, and an ******. _________________ "It's the same old Jay," Woodson told ESPN afterward. "We just need to be in position. Jay will throw us the ball." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mattwaukee
Joined: 22 Jan 2009 Posts: 3273
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
NM my post above, I thought this said "Packers sign Tanard Jackson." _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PossibleCabbage 
Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Posts: 2450
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Didn't PFF have him as the worst tackling DB in the league last year, or something close to that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TedThompson 
Joined: 01 Aug 2011 Posts: 802
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PossibleCabbage wrote: | | Didn't PFF have him as the worst tackling DB in the league last year, or something close to that? |
Hard to believe anyone topped our trio of Shields, Traymon, and Peprah last year.
Tanard would have fit right in with us. _________________ "It's the same old Jay," Woodson told ESPN afterward. "We just need to be in position. Jay will throw us the ball." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
triplejcubed3
Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 91 Location: Green Bay
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| There's plenty of other free agent safeties id rather have thanks anyways |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PackerfromFL
Joined: 10 Nov 2011 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Redskins are winning the superbowl next year. Just because of Jackson, the 2012 NFL MVP. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|