| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
McMorrow_922
Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Posts: 2532
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:41 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | MJD4MVP5455 wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | Mr. V wrote: | Robinson will waer 81, Osgood's old number.
Paraphrased from Tania Ganguli's twitter. |
So THAT'S why we got rid of Osgood. Good to know. |
What if we sign Mario Williams But he insists on wearing #11? we'll be screwed! |
We need to pray to god he doesnt like number 32 |
Because MJD would headbutt Mario in the belly over 32... |
MJD doesnt need a concussion |
If Mario wanted 32, Id hope Gene would cut him on ths spot, MJD is what keeps us going & tickets selling.
_________________
Adopt a JAGUAR
Laurent Robinson-
Marcedes Lewis- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| McMorrow_922 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | MJD4MVP5455 wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | Mr. V wrote: | Robinson will waer 81, Osgood's old number.
Paraphrased from Tania Ganguli's twitter. |
So THAT'S why we got rid of Osgood. Good to know. |
What if we sign Mario Williams But he insists on wearing #11? we'll be screwed! |
We need to pray to god he doesnt like number 32 |
Because MJD would headbutt Mario in the belly over 32... |
MJD doesnt need a concussion |
If Mario wanted 32, Id hope Gene would cut him on ths spot, MJD is what keeps us going & tickets selling. |
Cut who? Cut Mario? That would be smart, give him 50M guaranteed then cut him
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
McMorrow_922
Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Posts: 2532
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | McMorrow_922 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | MJD4MVP5455 wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | Mr. V wrote: | Robinson will waer 81, Osgood's old number.
Paraphrased from Tania Ganguli's twitter. |
So THAT'S why we got rid of Osgood. Good to know. |
What if we sign Mario Williams But he insists on wearing #11? we'll be screwed! |
We need to pray to god he doesnt like number 32 |
Because MJD would headbutt Mario in the belly over 32... |
MJD doesnt need a concussion |
If Mario wanted 32, Id hope Gene would cut him on ths spot, MJD is what keeps us going & tickets selling. |
Cut who? Cut Mario? That would be smart, give him 50M guaranteed then cut him |
I was meaning if Mario.wanted 32, & meaning id rather have MJD then i would Mario,
_________________
Adopt a JAGUAR
Laurent Robinson-
Marcedes Lewis- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MJD4MVP5455
Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Posts: 1200
Location: Boca Raton
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | McMorrow_922 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | MJD4MVP5455 wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | Mr. V wrote: | Robinson will waer 81, Osgood's old number.
Paraphrased from Tania Ganguli's twitter. |
So THAT'S why we got rid of Osgood. Good to know. |
What if we sign Mario Williams But he insists on wearing #11? we'll be screwed! |
We need to pray to god he doesnt like number 32 |
Because MJD would headbutt Mario in the belly over 32... |
MJD doesnt need a concussion |
If Mario wanted 32, Id hope Gene would cut him on ths spot, MJD is what keeps us going & tickets selling. |
Cut who? Cut Mario? That would be smart, give him 50M guaranteed then cut him |
Does that make us the Redskins
_________________
[img] [/img] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr. V
Joined: 07 Sep 2011
Posts: 2604
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| McMorrow_922 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | McMorrow_922 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | MJD4MVP5455 wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | Mr. V wrote: | Robinson will waer 81, Osgood's old number.
Paraphrased from Tania Ganguli's twitter. |
So THAT'S why we got rid of Osgood. Good to know. |
What if we sign Mario Williams But he insists on wearing #11? we'll be screwed! |
We need to pray to god he doesnt like number 32 |
Because MJD would headbutt Mario in the belly over 32... |
MJD doesnt need a concussion |
If Mario wanted 32, Id hope Gene would cut him on ths spot, MJD is what keeps us going & tickets selling. |
Cut who? Cut Mario? That would be smart, give him 50M guaranteed then cut him |
I was meaning if Mario.wanted 32, & meaning id rather have MJD then i would Mario, |
Mario couldn't wear 32 no matter how badly he wanted the jersey number.
_________________
Thank you daboyle250 for the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iPwn
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35456
Location: Stand United
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Couple things...
How did the conversation degrade to this?
Positions have set numbers that they are allowed to use. So those numbers wouldn't be something that Mario would want.
Players can choose to wear a number outside of the allowed numbers, but they would be fined every game. This is how Keyshawn Johnson first started wearing 19. Not something that most players would want to deal with weekly.
_________________
 | samgurl775 wrote: | | It's alright iPwn, you're my #1. |
| EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | Couple things...
How did the conversation degrade to this?
Positions have set numbers that they are allowed to use. So those numbers wouldn't be something that Mario would want.
Players can choose to wear a number outside of the allowed numbers, but they would be fined every game. This is how Keyshawn Johnson first started wearing 19. Not something that most players would want to deal with weekly. |
Well I bet Mario could afford it if he signed a $100M deal
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
charles shelton
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 1666
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
bleh...wr just passed de & cb as #1 priority in the draft. guess it's a lock we take the 2nd best wr in the draft at #7...just feels like we're settling here. the redskins really screwed us by overpaying for garcon. maybe we'll get lucky & hill or jeffrey will have a so-so proday and fall to us in the 2nd.
-charles |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bobloblaw86
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 9970
Location: Toronto
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| charles shelton wrote: | bleh...wr just passed de & cb as #1 priority in the draft. guess it's a lock we take the 2nd best wr in the draft at #7...just feels like we're settling here. the redskins really screwed us by overpaying for garcon. maybe we'll get lucky & hill or jeffrey will have a so-so proday and fall to us in the 2nd.
-charles |
I like Garcon, but I don't see how us landing him as opposed to Robinson would have changed that much. I said before that I don't see Garcon as a protoypical #1 option. A good second for sure. But I could see Robinson filling that role as well. Garcon or Robinson - with either one, the team could still use another pass catcher.
The truth is, other than VJax, there was no prototypical #1 guy that hit the market. It would have been overly optimistic to expect to land the only player out there who could have fit that need. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| charles shelton wrote: | bleh...wr just passed de & cb as #1 priority in the draft. guess it's a lock we take the 2nd best wr in the draft at #7...just feels like we're settling here. the redskins really screwed us by overpaying for garcon. maybe we'll get lucky & hill or jeffrey will have a so-so proday and fall to us in the 2nd.
-charles |
WR didnt pass anything. That was always our biggest need
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
charles shelton
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 1666
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | charles shelton wrote: | bleh...wr just passed de & cb as #1 priority in the draft. guess it's a lock we take the 2nd best wr in the draft at #7...just feels like we're settling here. the redskins really screwed us by overpaying for garcon. maybe we'll get lucky & hill or jeffrey will have a so-so proday and fall to us in the 2nd.
-charles |
WR didnt pass anything. That was always our biggest need |
no argument about need, but I said "priority", not need. I tend to wait until we get through the initial free agency period before solidifying my opinion about draft priorities. given our draft position and the likliehood that we adressed wr need through free agency, I had de & cb as higher draft priorities. if robinson is the only free agent wr we sign, wr becomes the highest draft priority imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| charles shelton wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | charles shelton wrote: | bleh...wr just passed de & cb as #1 priority in the draft. guess it's a lock we take the 2nd best wr in the draft at #7...just feels like we're settling here. the redskins really screwed us by overpaying for garcon. maybe we'll get lucky & hill or jeffrey will have a so-so proday and fall to us in the 2nd.
-charles |
WR didnt pass anything. That was always our biggest need |
no argument about need, but I said "priority", not need. I tend to wait until we get through the initial free agency period before solidifying my opinion about draft priorities. given our draft position and the likliehood that we adressed wr need through free agency, I had de & cb as higher draft priorities. if robinson is the only free agent wr we sign, wr becomes the highest draft priority imo. |
I still think it was our #1 priority. Obviously re-signing Mincey and Lowery were priorities because they were key to our defense last year, but in order to help Gabbert, our offense needs to get better ergo, WR is the #1 priority. Even if we didnt re-sign Mathis, I think WR was a bigger priority than CB.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blue Blood
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 2248
Location: Brooklyn
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm not supposed to link, but Grantland.com has a very convincing piece on why this is an embarrassingly bad deal for the Jaguars.
Mercedes Lewis all over again.
_________________
"17-14 is the final, okay? 17-14. One touchdown and we are world champions. Believe it and it will happen." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iPwn
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35456
Location: Stand United
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blue Blood wrote: | I'm not supposed to link, but Grantland.com has a very convincing piece on why this is an embarrassingly bad deal for the Jaguars.
Mercedes Lewis all over again. |
Where did everyone get this information that you aren't supposed to link to articles?
_________________
| samgurl775 wrote: | | It's alright iPwn, you're my #1. |
| EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | | Blue Blood wrote: | I'm not supposed to link, but Grantland.com has a very convincing piece on why this is an embarrassingly bad deal for the Jaguars.
Mercedes Lewis all over again. |
Where did everyone get this information that you aren't supposed to link to articles? |
Idk, i know you cant link to other forums though
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
