| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
brncos4life 
Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1564 Location: CT
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: dennard or fleener? |
|
|
|
doing a mock..fleener or alfonzo dennard at cb? or other?
wr available is sanu and randle..lineman are perry and worthy
i personally think dennard..defense will be unstoppable.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
struby3 
Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 3620 Location: Eastern Iowa
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Not too high on Dennard. I'd take Fleener or Randle. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oldman9er
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 36620 Location: New Orleans
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Easily Fleener over Dennard for me. _________________
___  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
49ers4life52
Joined: 18 Mar 2010 Posts: 2875 Location: Fresno, CA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Fleener _________________
^Kempes^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chrissooner49er
Joined: 03 Feb 2005 Posts: 3641 Location: Tulsa, OK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Dennard is not 1st round worthy, IMO. And most of you know my opinion of Fleener---definitely the pick I want at 30! _________________
fa·nat·ic (f-ntk)
A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
Fleener: 21 Recs 222yds 86 YAC Walker: 7 Recs 89yds 13YAC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scraly47* 
Joined: 28 Oct 2009 Posts: 3966
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Meachem/Fleener/Davis/Crabs. Add a second or third round WR and we are set  _________________
-Lork |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
48 1/2ers 
Joined: 01 Aug 2011 Posts: 2118 Location: Bay Area
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Nick Perry I doubt he'd normally be there but he's the BPA there and would give us the luxury of not needing to break the bank for Brooks. We could address WR through FA and the 2nd round also. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gore Whore 21
Joined: 15 Nov 2006 Posts: 3938 Location: South Dakota
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 48 1/2ers wrote: | | Nick Perry I doubt he'd normally be there but he's the BPA there and would give us the luxury of not needing to break the bank for Brooks. We could address WR through FA and the 2nd round also. |
Would definitely like having Perry. This is a deep receiver draft and we could pick one up in round 2. Perry could very well be the pass-rusher to come out of this draft. I say he's the pick. _________________ saintsfan on the sig
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."-Benjamin Franklin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swift21
Joined: 20 Oct 2011 Posts: 730 Location: SF
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I doubt Perry will be available at 30. I'll go with Andre Branch. _________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Pete is just an arrogant wanna-be Jim Harbaugh but he's just not as smart. |  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
49ers Finest
Joined: 28 Dec 2011 Posts: 5713 Location: San Jose
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah agreed with above perry. Fleener and hill are both good for me. Definately not dennard and not so high on randle.
If you can give a link to players chosen or something would help on the pick _________________ ***WE RUN THE WEST!***
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
49MM
Joined: 16 Jan 2012 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Fleener is a great talent, especially at pick # 30, but I don't want either. NT and LB is the most important position to a 3-4 defense and would go with Vinny Curry.
Adding Fleener would mean we need to carry 4 TE's V.Davis, Delanie Walker, Nate Bynam, and then Fleener.
And I surmise I'll have to give up on Stephen Hill from GT w/ his combine showing. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chrissooner49er
Joined: 03 Feb 2005 Posts: 3641 Location: Tulsa, OK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 49MM wrote: | Fleener is a great talent, especially at pick # 30, but I don't want either. NT and LB is the most important position to a 3-4 defense and would go with Vinny Curry.
Adding Fleener would mean we need to carry 4 TE's V.Davis, Delanie Walker, Nate Bynam, and then Fleener.
And I surmise I'll have to give up on Stephen Hill from GT w/ his combine showing. |
So fatten up an already substantially stocked side of the ball in the Defense when the O really needs a red zone threat? That doesn't make sense. _________________
fa·nat·ic (f-ntk)
A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
Fleener: 21 Recs 222yds 86 YAC Walker: 7 Recs 89yds 13YAC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adamq 
Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Posts: 7703 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We could do so many things with Davis, Fleener, Crabs, and Gore/Hunter.. I think Carlos Rogers comes back so CB isn't a need at all before the 5th, nor would Dennard be BPA. _________________
-kiltman
| Uncle Buck wrote: | | I'd rather have Tebow than any other QB in the NFL besides Rodgers, and I may even take him over Rodgers due to the difference in age. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
big9erfan
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10681
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Fleener over Dennard on talent. Plus, we shouldn't be using our first pick on a CB (all bets off if we don't resign Rogers). _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EverythingSF
Joined: 15 Jun 2010 Posts: 2996 Location: Merced, CA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If we draft Dennard in the first......I think he could fall to our 2nd......I will be severely disappointed with our draft and that's not even counting the rest of the picks.
I think Dennard is highly overrated and don't want anything to do with him _________________
^Thanks to NS922
| EverythingSF wrote: | | Boltstrikes wrote: |
Alex's Mom? |
Alex's High School Backup?  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|