Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

dennard or fleener?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
brncos4life


Joined: 12 Jan 2008
Posts: 1564
Location: CT
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:06 pm    Post subject: dennard or fleener? Reply with quote

doing a mock..fleener or alfonzo dennard at cb? or other?
wr available is sanu and randle..lineman are perry and worthy
i personally think dennard..defense will be unstoppable..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
struby3


Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 3620
Location: Eastern Iowa
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not too high on Dennard. I'd take Fleener or Randle.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 36647
Location: New Orleans
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easily Fleener over Dennard for me.
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
49ers4life52


Joined: 18 Mar 2010
Posts: 2917
Location: Fresno, CA
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fleener
_________________

^Kempes^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrissooner49er


Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 3641
Location: Tulsa, OK
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dennard is not 1st round worthy, IMO. And most of you know my opinion of Fleener---definitely the pick I want at 30!
_________________


fa·nat·ic (f-ntk)
A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
Fleener: 21 Recs 222yds 86 YAC Walker: 7 Recs 89yds 13YAC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scraly47*


Joined: 28 Oct 2009
Posts: 3966
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meachem/Fleener/Davis/Crabs. Add a second or third round WR and we are set Smile
_________________


-Lork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
48 1/2ers


Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 2120
Location: Bay Area
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick Perry I doubt he'd normally be there but he's the BPA there and would give us the luxury of not needing to break the bank for Brooks. We could address WR through FA and the 2nd round also.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gore Whore 21


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 3945
Location: South Dakota
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

48 1/2ers wrote:
Nick Perry I doubt he'd normally be there but he's the BPA there and would give us the luxury of not needing to break the bank for Brooks. We could address WR through FA and the 2nd round also.


Would definitely like having Perry. This is a deep receiver draft and we could pick one up in round 2. Perry could very well be the pass-rusher to come out of this draft. I say he's the pick.
_________________
saintsfan on the sig

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."-Benjamin Franklin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Swift21


Joined: 20 Oct 2011
Posts: 746
Location: SF
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I doubt Perry will be available at 30. I'll go with Andre Branch.
_________________

SaveourSonics wrote:
Pete is just an arrogant wanna-be Jim Harbaugh but he's just not as smart.
Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
49ers Finest


Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 5724
Location: San Jose
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah agreed with above perry. Fleener and hill are both good for me. Definately not dennard and not so high on randle.
If you can give a link to players chosen or something would help on the pick
_________________
***WE RUN THE WEST!***
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
49MM


Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 36
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fleener is a great talent, especially at pick # 30, but I don't want either. NT and LB is the most important position to a 3-4 defense and would go with Vinny Curry.

Adding Fleener would mean we need to carry 4 TE's V.Davis, Delanie Walker, Nate Bynam, and then Fleener.

And I surmise I'll have to give up on Stephen Hill from GT w/ his combine showing.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrissooner49er


Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 3641
Location: Tulsa, OK
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

49MM wrote:
Fleener is a great talent, especially at pick # 30, but I don't want either. NT and LB is the most important position to a 3-4 defense and would go with Vinny Curry.

Adding Fleener would mean we need to carry 4 TE's V.Davis, Delanie Walker, Nate Bynam, and then Fleener.

And I surmise I'll have to give up on Stephen Hill from GT w/ his combine showing.


So fatten up an already substantially stocked side of the ball in the Defense when the O really needs a red zone threat? That doesn't make sense.
_________________


fa·nat·ic (f-ntk)
A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
Fleener: 21 Recs 222yds 86 YAC Walker: 7 Recs 89yds 13YAC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adamq


Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 7709
Location: Missouri
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We could do so many things with Davis, Fleener, Crabs, and Gore/Hunter.. I think Carlos Rogers comes back so CB isn't a need at all before the 5th, nor would Dennard be BPA.
_________________

-kiltman

Uncle Buck wrote:
I'd rather have Tebow than any other QB in the NFL besides Rodgers, and I may even take him over Rodgers due to the difference in age.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big9erfan


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10717
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fleener over Dennard on talent. Plus, we shouldn't be using our first pick on a CB (all bets off if we don't resign Rogers).
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EverythingSF


Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 2996
Location: Merced, CA
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we draft Dennard in the first......I think he could fall to our 2nd......I will be severely disappointed with our draft and that's not even counting the rest of the picks.

I think Dennard is highly overrated and don't want anything to do with him
_________________

^Thanks to NS922

EverythingSF wrote:
Boltstrikes wrote:

Alex's Mom?

Alex's High School Backup? Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group