| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Best Prospect |
| Matthew Stafford |
|
64% |
[ 49 ] |
| Sam Bradford |
|
15% |
[ 12 ] |
| Robert Griffin III |
|
19% |
[ 15 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 76 |
|
| Author |
Message |
brownie man 
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Posts: 6082
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: Better Prospect Matthew Stafford, Sam Bradford, or RG3? |
|
|
|
Stafford was on ESPN earlier today, and I got to thinking how everyone talks about how Luck is the best quarterback prospect since Manning and the easiest number 1 pick. Now scouts talk about how RG3 could potentially go above Luck so they have to at least be close in prospects and if Luck wasnt coming out RG3 would be the clear number 1 pick.
So that got me thinking how does RG3 compare to other number 1 picks at QB.
Everyone compares him to Cam Newton, but what about Stafford and Bradford.
I think athletically RG3 is head and shoulders above Bradford and I think hes an overall better prospect. Even though both played in the Big 12 I think RG3 was more dominate especially playing the lesser talent around him.
With Stafford I think Stafford was the best out of the three I was a huge Stafford fan because I loved his arm, playing in the SEC, and his winning mentality.
so I go Stafford>RG3>>>>>>>>>>>>Bradford _________________
And in the 2012 NBA Draft the Cleveland Cavaliers select
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPWOJrXJeqg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TD_Tommie 
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Posts: 4662 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd say Sam Bradford. People on here actually weren't very high on Stafford and there was a lot of hate on him.
Same goes with Bradford but it was credited to his system and weak arm (which aren't negatives to me, because there have been several good qb's coming out of the spread now, and his arm isn't really bad).
RGIII has me super excited and am a big fan of his, but I don't know if I'd draft him. Too much of a high risk - high reward player. _________________ You are on my DISLIKE list, Denver.
[quote="Ace5"]I've been practicing the oath to order. Just got my song of storms make it rain tshirt in the mail too.[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iknowcool 
Joined: 15 Apr 2009 Posts: 11409
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
1. Matthew Stafford
2. Sam Bradford
3. Robert Griffin
I actually wasn't a big fan of Stafford but I'd still take him as a prospect over Bradford and Griffin. From what I've seen of Griffin (and I'm not going to pretend I'm as familiar with him as others are), I really think most of his hype is due to the success of Newton. Not to say that one thing means another is guaranteed but has any quarterback out of the Air Raid offense in college actually found any success in the NFL?
I think he has a lot of potential but I wouldn't be surprised if he saw a large fall in the draft compared to where he is usually slated to go. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kenney 
Joined: 24 Dec 2006 Posts: 11374
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Matthew Stafford was better than both Bradford and Griffin III as a prospect by a long shot. _________________ Welcome to Houston, DeAndre Hopkins! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Falastine
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 3448
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.
Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles. _________________ IN THE BAY AREA WE SMOKE PHILLIES |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheVillain112 
 Joined: 19 Feb 2010 Posts: 12478
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Stafford>Bradford=RGIII
If not for the injury concerns, I would say Bradford>RGIII... _________________
Thanks Rammy... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
All IN 14-0!
Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Falastine wrote: | Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.
Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles. |
That "title" will forever be worn by last years #1 pick. Go back and read this forum at this time last year. Everyone else is a distant second to Cam when it comes to criticism of a top pick.
I agree that it was hard to understand why some people didn't believe in Stafford. His tools were as good as any QB prospect since Elway. Peyton was more advanced mentally, but not physically. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Falastine
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 3448
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| All IN 14-0! wrote: | | Falastine wrote: | Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.
Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles. |
That "title" will forever be worn by last years #1 pick. Go back and read this forum at this time last year. Everyone else is a distant second to Cam when it comes to criticism of a top pick.
I agree that it was hard to understand why some people didn't believe in Stafford. His tools were as good as any QB prospect since Elway. Peyton was more advanced mentally, but not physically. |
I said "one of".
And Stafford was extremely advanced mentally. Mark Richt let him call his own plays and make his own pre snap reads/adjustments as a true freshmen. That's rarely seen in college. _________________ IN THE BAY AREA WE SMOKE PHILLIES |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Supersuavesky 
Joined: 23 Nov 2008 Posts: 23041 Location: Anywhere But Here
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
In order of the poll by far. _________________ PSN: Suavesky
| iPwn wrote: | | I'd rather be ignorant to others' ignorance. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mich_fan20 
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 16552
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Stafford by far. I had Bradford around 15. RG3 around 5-7. _________________
mack. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
All IN 14-0!
Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Falastine wrote: | | All IN 14-0! wrote: | | Falastine wrote: | Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.
Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles. |
That "title" will forever be worn by last years #1 pick. Go back and read this forum at this time last year. Everyone else is a distant second to Cam when it comes to criticism of a top pick.
I agree that it was hard to understand why some people didn't believe in Stafford. His tools were as good as any QB prospect since Elway. Peyton was more advanced mentally, but not physically. |
I said "one of".
And Stafford was extremely advanced mentally. Mark Richt let him call his own plays and make his own pre snap reads/adjustments as a true freshmen. That's rarely seen in college. |
Wasn't meant as a shot at Stafford. I don't think any QB, ever, was as mentally prepared as Peyton. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dhunt2402 
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 16672 Location: The District
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Stafford by a fair margin. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spartan300
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Posts: 588
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
1) Stafford
2) Bradford
3) RG3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaguarCrazy2832 
Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 73469
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Stafford is the best imo. Bradford's injury had alot of people worried _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SadLionFan00 
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 14342 Location: Michigan State University
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Stafford easily. Followed by RGIII, with Bradford next.
Bradford was a late riser, if most of you remember. It wasnt until later that the Bradford #1 to the Rams hype train started (fueled by Schefter). I feel he was one of the lesser top 5 QB prospects in the past decade. _________________
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | Quote: | | Trestman is a great coach but Cutler is already a pouty overconfident poo flinger. What more can he do with him? | Get him to fling poo more accurately and make better decisions when flinging it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|