Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Better Prospect Matthew Stafford, Sam Bradford, or RG3?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Best Prospect
Matthew Stafford
64%
 64%  [ 49 ]
Sam Bradford
15%
 15%  [ 12 ]
Robert Griffin III
19%
 19%  [ 15 ]
Total Votes : 76

Author Message
brownie man


Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 6257
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:07 pm    Post subject: Better Prospect Matthew Stafford, Sam Bradford, or RG3? Reply with quote

Stafford was on ESPN earlier today, and I got to thinking how everyone talks about how Luck is the best quarterback prospect since Manning and the easiest number 1 pick. Now scouts talk about how RG3 could potentially go above Luck so they have to at least be close in prospects and if Luck wasnt coming out RG3 would be the clear number 1 pick.

So that got me thinking how does RG3 compare to other number 1 picks at QB.

Everyone compares him to Cam Newton, but what about Stafford and Bradford.

I think athletically RG3 is head and shoulders above Bradford and I think hes an overall better prospect. Even though both played in the Big 12 I think RG3 was more dominate especially playing the lesser talent around him.

With Stafford I think Stafford was the best out of the three I was a huge Stafford fan because I loved his arm, playing in the SEC, and his winning mentality.

so I go Stafford>RG3>>>>>>>>>>>>Bradford
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TD_Tommie


Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Posts: 4662
Location: Nebraska
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say Sam Bradford. People on here actually weren't very high on Stafford and there was a lot of hate on him.

Same goes with Bradford but it was credited to his system and weak arm (which aren't negatives to me, because there have been several good qb's coming out of the spread now, and his arm isn't really bad).

RGIII has me super excited and am a big fan of his, but I don't know if I'd draft him. Too much of a high risk - high reward player.
_________________
You are on my DISLIKE list, Denver.
[quote="Ace5"]I've been practicing the oath to order. Just got my song of storms make it rain tshirt in the mail too.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iknowcool


Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Posts: 13166
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. Matthew Stafford
2. Sam Bradford
3. Robert Griffin

I actually wasn't a big fan of Stafford but I'd still take him as a prospect over Bradford and Griffin. From what I've seen of Griffin (and I'm not going to pretend I'm as familiar with him as others are), I really think most of his hype is due to the success of Newton. Not to say that one thing means another is guaranteed but has any quarterback out of the Air Raid offense in college actually found any success in the NFL?

I think he has a lot of potential but I wouldn't be surprised if he saw a large fall in the draft compared to where he is usually slated to go.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kenney


Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Posts: 11920
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matthew Stafford was better than both Bradford and Griffin III as a prospect by a long shot.
_________________
davidpalmer714 wrote:
Kenney>Everyone else on here
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Falastine


Joined: 02 Sep 2008
Posts: 3601
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.

Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles.
_________________
IN THE BAY AREA WE SMOKE PHILLIES
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheVillain112


Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 16057
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stafford>Bradford=RGIII

If not for the injury concerns, I would say Bradford>RGIII...
_________________


chris00cm wrote:
Lavelle Hawkins figures he's already cut, so YOLO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
All IN 14-0!


Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 527
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Falastine wrote:
Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.

Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles.


That "title" will forever be worn by last years #1 pick. Go back and read this forum at this time last year. Everyone else is a distant second to Cam when it comes to criticism of a top pick.

I agree that it was hard to understand why some people didn't believe in Stafford. His tools were as good as any QB prospect since Elway. Peyton was more advanced mentally, but not physically.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Falastine


Joined: 02 Sep 2008
Posts: 3601
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All IN 14-0! wrote:
Falastine wrote:
Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.

Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles.


That "title" will forever be worn by last years #1 pick. Go back and read this forum at this time last year. Everyone else is a distant second to Cam when it comes to criticism of a top pick.

I agree that it was hard to understand why some people didn't believe in Stafford. His tools were as good as any QB prospect since Elway. Peyton was more advanced mentally, but not physically.


I said "one of".

And Stafford was extremely advanced mentally. Mark Richt let him call his own plays and make his own pre snap reads/adjustments as a true freshmen. That's rarely seen in college.
_________________
IN THE BAY AREA WE SMOKE PHILLIES
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Supersuavesky


Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 28697
Location: Anywhere But Here
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In order of the poll by far.
_________________
PSN: Suavesky

Bleedin_Green36 wrote:
Supersuavesky wrote:


Okay.

Sacramento is a finals team now folks. Laughing


yeah so? Would anyone here disagree?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mich_fan20


Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 17574
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stafford by far. I had Bradford around 15. RG3 around 5-7.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
All IN 14-0!


Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 527
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Falastine wrote:
All IN 14-0! wrote:
Falastine wrote:
Stafford was one of the most underrated 1st overall picks I had ever seen. Aside from being 6'4 or 6'5, he was the complete package at QB as a prospect.

Meanwhile, I had Bradford and have Griffin III rated as 2nd round picks. I'll take Staff here, and by two miles.


That "title" will forever be worn by last years #1 pick. Go back and read this forum at this time last year. Everyone else is a distant second to Cam when it comes to criticism of a top pick.

I agree that it was hard to understand why some people didn't believe in Stafford. His tools were as good as any QB prospect since Elway. Peyton was more advanced mentally, but not physically.


I said "one of".

And Stafford was extremely advanced mentally. Mark Richt let him call his own plays and make his own pre snap reads/adjustments as a true freshmen. That's rarely seen in college.


Wasn't meant as a shot at Stafford. I don't think any QB, ever, was as mentally prepared as Peyton.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dhunt2402


Moderator
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 21744
Location: The District
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stafford by a fair margin.
_________________

Deadpulse on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spartan300


Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Posts: 636
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1) Stafford
2) Bradford
3) RG3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JaguarCrazy2832


Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 82438
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stafford is the best imo. Bradford's injury had alot of people worried
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SadLionFan00


Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Posts: 14342
Location: Michigan State University
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stafford easily. Followed by RGIII, with Bradford next.

Bradford was a late riser, if most of you remember. It wasnt until later that the Bradford #1 to the Rams hype train started (fueled by Schefter). I feel he was one of the lesser top 5 QB prospects in the past decade.
_________________
Silver&Black88 wrote:
Quote:
Trestman is a great coach but Cutler is already a pouty overconfident poo flinger. What more can he do with him?
Get him to fling poo more accurately and make better decisions when flinging it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group