Trade Up for MIKE WILLIAMS

indaslums · Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 22

With an additional first rounder. Will we trade up and get THE MIKE WILLIAMS?

guinis72 · Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 25

I hope not!! I think it'd be a bad move esentially giving up 3 1st rounders to get him (1.09, 1.25, '06 1st rounder it cost us to get the 1.25). With only 2 picks in this yr's draft and no 1st rounder next yr I think we need to get 2 players out of this draft that will be starters.

e16bball · Joined: 17 Dec 2004 Posts: 14996

One thing I would not mind seeing is is a trade to a team at the top of the draft. Let's say its the Bears. We move 9 and 25 to them for in return for 4 and 39. I realize the points are a bit off there, but if they feel they can still get Benson at 9 and would like to have a shot at Matt Jones (who I hear they covet) they might just do that. It is within 10% which is the general rule. That allows us to take Mike Williams (or Braylon) and still leaves a pick which could be used perhaps for Marlin Jackson or Bryant McFadden. Thoughts?

secondeye · Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 213 Location: Chanhassen, MN

guinis72 · Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 25

Lol, speaking of the clue train where exactly did I say that I thought we made a good deal and that we should take Campbell? By the way, are you so bitter than you need to post on every thread in this forum just to talk trash??

What I was saying is that with the 1.09 + 1.25 we can get 2 players that will be starters this yr rather than trading them to get 1 player with no 1st rounder next yr.